Diagnosis
CP is usually recognized early in life when a child fails to reach motor
milestones at the appropriate chronological age. Diagnosis is based on detailed
history and physical examination, including a neurological evaluation.
Since CP is distinguished from degenerative brain disorders, medical history
must establish that the child is not losing previously acquired function.
However, some neurological disorders, due to slow progression of symptoms, may
initially be mistaken for CP (eg, dopa-responsive dystonia, hereditary spastic
paraplegia, ataxia telangiectasia). These conditions may be suggested by unusual
complaints, a history of progressing deficits, characteristic abnormalities on
neuroimaging studies, or a family history of childhood neurologic disorder with
associated CP.
During examination, pediatricians should check developmental reflexes, muscle
tone, deep tendon reflexes, and plantar responses. Attention should be paid to
reflexes that are retained for abnormally long periods, which is common for
children with CP. The Moro reflex, for example, tends to be seen beyond the usual
6 months in children with CP. However, children with CP may develop hand
preference much earlier than usual (age 3).
It is also useful to classify the clinical type of CP, since this has
implications regarding etiology and associated conditions, as discussed in more
detail below. In one study, 44% of the CP population were spastic diplegic, 33%
spastic hemiplegic, and 6% spastic quadriplegic. Even less common presentations
include ataxic and dyskinetic CP. [2]
Etiology
The brain abnormality resulting in CP may have been caused by various
antenatal, perinatal and postnatal events. In the past, the most common cause of
CP in the term or near term infant was thought to be intrapartum
hypoxic-ischemic injury, often called perinatal asphyxia. It is now known that
hypoxia-ischemia is not the only cause of neonatal encephalopathy, and that CP
is rarely caused by hypoxia-ischemia. Epidemiological studies have established
that antenatal factors account for as much as 70% of acute neonatal
encephalopathy. [3]
Furthermore, not all cases of neonatal encephalopathy result in CP. Mild
encephalopathy is invariably associated with favorable prognosis, and normal
outcome is seen in about 75%-80% infants with moderate encephalopathy. [4] All
infants with severe encephalopathy stringently defined have a poor outcome. [4]
According to the essential criteria developed by the
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, [3] in order to attribute
CP to intrapartum hypoxia, the child born at 34 or more
weeks of gestation must have had the clinical signs of severe or moderate neonatal encephalopathy,
defined as seizures, abnormal tone, poor feeding, and a depressed
level of consciousness within the first 24 hours of life. Computed
tomography (CT) scan and electroencephalogram (EEG) if obtained will be abnormal. In
addition, evidence of a metabolic acidosis in fetal umbilical cord
arterial blood obtained at delivery (pH<
7and base deficit >/ = 12
mmol/L) is needed, as well as exclusion of other identifiable etiologies such as
trauma, coagulation disorders, infectious conditions, or genetic disorders.
Finally, the only forms of CP attributable to acute hypoxic intrapartum events
are spastic quadriplegic and, less commonly, the dyskinetic type.
Spastic quadriplegia, however, may result from causes other than intrapartum
hypoxia. Also, purely dyskinetic or ataxic CP, especially with an associated
learning difficulty, commonly has a genetic etiology and is rarely caused by
intrapartum or peripartum asphyxia.
Spastic hemiplegia and spastic diplegia are almost always due to antepartum
events, the latter occurring almost exclusively in preterm babies. [5]
Generally, infants born very prematurely or with low birth weight are at higher
risk for CP, compared to term or near-term infants.
CP with antenatal origins is often due to infections during pregnancy (eg,
rubella, cytomegalovirus, toxoplasmosis), stroke, toxemia, or placental
abruption. [6] Other antenatal factors associated with CP include intrauterine
growth restrictions, multiple pregnancies, coagulation disorders, antepartum
bleeding, congenital or genetic anomalies, and infertility treatments. [3] In
addition to hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, other causes of CP with perinatal
onset include kernicterus and trauma. [6] Postnatal causes of CP include brain
infections (eg, bacterial meningitis, viral encephalitis), progressive
hydrocephalus, or brain injury from car accidents, falls, or child abuse. [6]
Diagnostic testing
The role of diagnostic testing is to clarify the etiology and suggest the
prognosis based on the type and severity of confirmed brain injury. In the
recently published guidelines from the American Academy of Neurology and the
Child Neurology Society, [6] neuroimaging is recommended as the initial
diagnostic study in children with CP. (See images 1-4 below for examples of
neuroimaging studies used as diagnostic tools in CP evaluation.) The guidelines
do not recommend routine use of metabolic and genetic testing, coagulation
studies, or EEG. However, since 70% of children with CP have associated
conditions, [1] early screening is advised for potential cognitive delay, vision
and hearing impairments, speech and language disorders, and swallowing
disorders.
* Note that for all images the left side of the brain appears on the
right side of the image.

Image 1: MRI axial T2 sequence of a 14-month-old girl with a right
hemiparesis. There is an abnormal hyperintense signal in the white matter of the
right hemisphere indicating an old (antepartum) infarct.

Image 2: MRI axial T1 sequence of a 14-month-old boy with microcephaly
and delayed motor development. The MRI demonstrates enlarged ventricles and a
large porencephalic cyst in the left frontal lobe with a thin rim of residual
cortex. There is also thickened and simplified cortex (pachygyria) in the right
frontal lobe.

Image 3: CT scan of an 18-month-old girl born prematurely who sustained
an intraventricular hemorrhage. She has a left hemiparesis and a mild degree of
spastic diparesis. The CT scan demonstrates enlargement of the right lateral
ventricle.

Image 4: CT scan of a 5-month-old boy with a severe spastic quadriparesis
and acquired microcephaly associated with an intrapartum hypoxic-ischemic
injury. The scan shows marked diffuse atrophy and encephalomalacia with
secondary enlargement of the ventricles and sulci.
MRI or CT
The AAN/CNS review of research concluded that magnetic resonance imaging
(MRI) is preferable to CT, since MRI was abnormal in 89% of children with CP,
compared to 77% of cases with abnormal CT findings. MRI also is more sensitive
than CT in detecting periventricular leukomalacia, other perinatally acquired
lesions, and subtle congenital anomalies of brain development, and is more
useful in determining whether the brain injury was antenatal, perinatal, or
postnatal. Periventricular white matter damage (eg, periventricular
leukomalacia) is frequently found in children with CP who were preterm births. A
child with CP who was a preterm birth and suffered severe cerebral hypoperfusion
during early fetal life, however, will usually have injury that is mostly in the
deep gray matter and brain stem nuclei. In term births, severe reduction to
cerebral blood flow more commonly causes injury to subcortical white matter and
cerebral cortex. [7]
Genetic and metabolic testing
Since the introduction of neuroimaging, congenital brain malformations have
been discovered in some children with CP (12% on MRI and 7% on CT). [6] These
malformations include lissencephaly, schizencephaly, and pachygyria, which have
been associated with specific genetic disorders (eg, lissencephaly/Miller-Dieker
syndrome/ chromosome 17p13.3, Zellweger syndrome). Also, some metabolic
disorders may appear as CP. These disorders include glutaric aciduria (type 1),
Lesch-Nyhan syndrome, 3-methylglutaconic aciduria, pyruvate dehydrogenase
deficiency, and female carriers of ornithine transcarbamylase deficiency. If a
brain malformation is found in a child with CP, or if neuroimaging does not show
a specific structural abnormality, genetic or metabolic testing is warranted.
Coagulopathies
Diagnostic testing for coagulation disorders should be considered only in
children with spastic hemiplegic CP, since neuroimaging shows high incidence of
unexplained cerebral infarction in these children. Coagulation disorders may
include Factor V Leiden deficiency, the presence of anticardiolipin or
antiphospholipid antibodies, and Protein C or S deficiency.
Epilepsy and EEG
Although epilepsy accompanies cerebral palsy in 45% of cases, [6] routine EEG
is not useful during initial evaluation, since it does not help to determine the
etiology of CP. An EEG is recommended only when epileptic features are present.
Epilepsy is seen more often in children with spastic quadriplegia or hemiplegia,
compared to children with other types of CP.
Children with CP and epilepsy are classified as having symptomatic epilepsy.
Children with epilepsy associated with CP are more likely to have neonatal
seizures and seizures within the first year of life, status epilepticus, and a
need for polytherapy. These children are more likely to have partial seizures
and are less likely to become seizure free. In children with CP and epilepsy,
favorable factors associated with a seizure-free period of 1 year or more
include normal intelligence, single seizure type, monotherapy, and spastic
diplegia. [8]
Screening for other associated conditions
Screening for conditions commonly found in children with CP must be included
in the initial evaluation. Cognitive delay occurs in 52% of children with CP,
and it is more likely to be present if neuroimaging studies are abnormal than if
they are normal or have minor abnormalities. [9] Also, type and etiology of CP
are associated with specific disorders. For example, mental impairment tends be
more severe in children with spastic quadriplegia than in children with spastic
hemiplegia or diplegia. Visual problems, found in 28% of cases, are more likely
in children whose CP was caused by periventricular leukomalacia. [6] Hearing
impairment occurs in 12% of children with CP, and is more frequent when CP is
related to very low birth weight, kernicterus, neonatal meningitis, or severe
hypoxic-ischemic insults. [6]
Prognostic implications of neuroimaging findings
Neuroimaging is helpful in determining prognosis. Outcomes are less favorable
in children with bilateral injury involving cortical and subcortical structures
usually associated with a spastic quadriparetic type of CP. Neuroimaging findings
of atrophy, abnormal gray matter configuration, and marked leukomalacia usually
imply severe impairment. [10]
In very premature infants, selective vulnerability of the periventricular
white matter to ischemic injury produces diplegic CP with greater motor deficit
in the lower extremities compared to the upper extremities. In term infants,
white matter lesions with internal capsule involvement are associated with
abnormal motor outcome, whereas moderate white matter changes with normal
internal capsule are correlated with normal motor function. [11]
Extensive bilateral cerebral and basal ganglia lesions, associated with
spastic quadriplegia and the most adverse outcome, commonly signal epilepsy and
severe cognitive, motor, visual and auditory impairments. [11] Mild basal
ganglia lesions, however, are found in dyskinetic type of CP and indicate minor
neuro-motor abnormalities and sometimes normal cognitive development. [11]
Children with focal ischemic injury (stroke) limited to 1 hemisphere will
usually have a residual hemiparesis, but are likely to have normal or nearly
normal cognitive function. The MRI will show loss of brain parenchyma and
compensatory increase in the size of the ventricles and subarachnoid spaces on
the involved side. Partial seizures with or without secondary generalization are
also common with this type of injury.
Although neuroimaging studies help to assess prognosis for a child's CP, more
substantial prognostic information must be derived by considering imaging data
in combination with clinical evaluation.
Pediatric neurology consultation
In evaluation and management of a child with cerebral palsy, consultation
with a pediatric neurologist should be considered when there are questions about
accuracy of the diagnosis, to determine the underlying cause, or if there are
unusual clinical features to suggest that the child may have a progressive
rather than a static condition. A pediatric neurologist may also help to inform
parents about initial evaluation, interpretation of neuroimaging studies, and
prognosis. Severe cases can be referred to a pediatric neurologist for regular
evaluations on annual or semiannual basis, and for coordination of therapy with
physical, occupational and speech therapists, and with orthopedic specialists.
Finally, a referral is needed when there are associated neurological problems,
in particular seizures, which may be difficult to control.
Conclusion
CP is common and will be seen in most pediatric practices. There are multiple
causes of CP and the pediatrician should not assume that minor events in the
intrapartum period are responsible without careful consideration of the criteria
for neonatal encephalopathy and a thorough investigation for other causes. There
are medical-legal implications to casual comments or written notes regarding the
etiology of CP even if these are not well founded. Neuroimaging, in particular
MRI, is the most useful diagnostic tool for children with CP. Neurological
consultation is most often justified to help establish the type of cerebral palsy
and to discuss prognosis with the child's parents.
REFERENCES
[1.] Boyle CA, Yeargin-Allsopp M, Doernberg NS, et al. Prevalence of
selected developmental disabilities in children 3-10 years of age: the
Metropolitan Atlanta Developmental Disabilities Surveillance. MMWR 1996;45:1-14.
[2.] Hagberg B, Hagberg G, Beckung E, et al. Changing panorama of cerebral
palsy in Sweden. VIII. Prevalence and origin in the birth year period 1991-94.
Acta Paediatr 2001;90:271-277.
[3.] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Task Force on
Neonatal Encephalopathy and Cerebral Palsy. Neonatal Encephalopathy and Cerebral
Palsy: Defining the Pathogenesis and Pathophysiology. Washington, DC: ACOG; 2003.
[4.] Volpe JJ. Neurology of the Inborn. 4th ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB
Saunders; 2001.
[5.] Nelson KB, Grether JK. Potentially asphyxiating conditions and spastic
cerebral palsy in infants of normal birth weight. Am J Obstet Gynecol
1998;179:507-513.
[6.] Ashwal S, Russman BS, Blasco PA, et al. Practice Parameter: Diagnostic
assessment of the child with cerebral palsy: Report of the Quality Standards
Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology and the Practice Committee of
the Child Neurology Society. Neurology 2004;62(6):851-863.
[7.] Barkovich AJ, Hallam D. Neuroimaging in perinatal hypoxic ischemic
injury. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev 1997;3:28-41.
[8.] Wallace SJ. Epilepsy in cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol
2001;43:713-717.
[ 9.] Schouman-Claeys E, Picard A, Lalande G, et al. Contribution of
computed tomography in the aetiology and prognosis of cerebral palsy in
children. Br J Radiol 1989;62:248-252.
[10.] Yokochi K, Hosoe A, Shimabukuro S, et al. Gross motor patterns in
children with cerebral palsy and spastic diplegia. Pediatr Neurol 1990;6:245.
[11.] Mercuri E, Barnett AL. Neonatal brain MRI and motor outcome in school
age children with neonatal encephalopathy: A review of personal experience.
Neural Plasticity 2003;10(1-2):51-57. |