Continuing Medical Education

Abnormal Urinalysis: Hematuria and Proteinuria

by Amy Bobrowski, MD

Summary

With the increased performance of screening urine dips and urinalyses in the pediatrician’s office, the discovery of asymptomatic blood and/or protein in the urine has become more common. As the list of possible conditions that can lead to such findings is long and can be anxiety-producing for patients, parents, and pediatricians, a tailored approach is required to rule out serious conditions, avoid unnecessary testing, and determine when further evaluation by a specialist is required. The purpose of this article is to review the differential diagnoses of hematuria and proteinuria, and to describe a straightforward plan for evaluation and possible referral.

Educational objectives

At the conclusion of this activity, participants will be able to:

  • Confirm urinalysis abnormalities and determine when the findings are clinically significant
  • Identify common etiologies of hematuria and/or proteinuria in the pediatric patient
  • Differentiate between findings that are likely benign and those that require prompt evaluation

CME credit

This is an article from The Child's Doctor, Fall 2008 issue. You must read all seven articles and complete each related quiz before receiving 2 Category 1 credits for the Fall 2008 issue.

Author disclosures

Dr. Bobrowski has no industry relationships to disclose and does not refer to products that are still investigational or not labeled for the use in discussion.


Printable
version


Microscopic hematuria

Microscopic hematuria is usually defined as >5 red blood cells (RBC) per high power field (hpf) by microscopic examination of the urine. It cannot be diagnosed by urine dipstick alone, as false-positives may result from other pigments, such as myoglobin, bilirubin, and some dyes, in the absence of any blood. The prevalence of microscopic hematuria in schoolchildren has been estimated to range from 0.5% to 2%, depending on criteria used.[1,2] Up to 6% may have hematuria on a single urinalysis, but this figure falls dramatically when the test is repeated.[3] In fact, one study showed an estimated incidence of only 0.41% when 4 urine samples per child were analyzed over more than a year.[4] Therefore, in the case of isolated asymptomatic microscopic hematuria (no proteinuria, edema, hypertension, or gross hematuria), a positive urinalysis should be confirmed with at least 2 more repeated urinalyses over the next weeks to month, prior to pursuing more aggressive evaluation. This defines persistent microscopic hematuria.

The confirmation of persistent microscopic hematuria warrants additional diagnostic evaluation. Initial work-up should include a family history, in which findings of chronic kidney disease (CKD), hearing loss, or kidney stones in family members are adequate reasons for a nephrology referral. A physical examination with abnormal blood pressure or growth parameters should also lead to evaluation by a kidney diseases specialist.

Additionally, initial evaluation should include blood testing that includes a complete blood count (CBC) and a renal function panel (RFP; basic chemistry panel plus serum albumin) to confirm normal kidney function. As there is no single serum creatinine value that is universally normal for all children, even at any given age, the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) should be calculated. The best available equation for this purpose currently is the Schwartz equation,[5-7] which adjusts calculated GFR for body mass utilizing patient height and a constant dependent on age and gender. (See National Kidney Foundation Web site for GFR calculator: http://www.kidney.org/professionals/tools/). A normal eGFR is considered to be >90 ml/min/1.73 m2.

Although probably of lower yield in the case of persistent microscopic hematuria, a renal ultrasound is noninvasive and can reasonably rule out many kidney stones, structural abnormalities, tumors, bladder inflammation, and hydronephrosis resulting from obstruction.

If this initial evaluation for persistent microscopic hematuria yields all normal results with a negative family history, follow-up with yearly urinalysis and blood pressure check should be sufficient. Specialist referral is usually not necessary at this time, as conditions associated with isolated microhematuria are generally benign, with no treatment indicated unless further symptoms or signs develop.

While gross hematuria may warrant referral to an urologist in some situations (see below), persistent microscopic hematuria with any abnormalities uncovered in the evaluation suggested above is usually most appropriate for referral to a kidney diseases specialist (pediatric nephrologist in older parlance).

The most common diagnoses causing persistent microscopic hematuria include benign familial hematuria (also known as thin basement membrane disease or TBMD), idiopathic hypercalciuria (IH), IgA nephropathy, and Alport's syndrome.[8,9] Sickle cell trait can be another consideration, depending on the child's ethnic background. A family history of microscopic hematuria with or without kidney dysfunction (TBMD, IgA nephropathy, Alport's syndrome), hearing loss (Alport's Syndrome), or kidney stones (IH or other metabolic stone diseases) can also be helpful in narrowing the differential, as can a patient report of recent trauma, throat or skin infection, or rash or joint pain.

Serum complement levels and search for autoimmune disease, such as with an ANA (antinuclear antibody) test, are often performed, to rule out post-infectious glomerulonephritis or lupus nephritis, but are not likely to be of high yield without associated proteinuria, gross hematuria, or other urine, laboratory, physical, or historical findings. A "spot" urine calcium to creatinine ratio (normal <0.2) is sometimes used to screen for hypercalciuria, but is very unreliable. A complete 24-hour urine collection for calcium (normal <4 mg/kg/day) is more accurate for diagnosis. Even in the absence of kidney stones, the calcium oxalate crystals of most cases of IH can be sufficient to cause hematuria with or without associated urinary frequency or dysuria, and can have implications for systemic bone health.[10] Other work-up may include a hearing test or hemoglobin electrophoresis, depending on the level of suspicion.

Kidney biopsy is usually reserved for cases in which IH/kidney stones have been ruled out and that also have 1 of the following: abnormalities in the above laboratory evaluation (eg, persistent hypocomplementemia or positive ANA), a significantly positive family history of kidney disease, or the development of proteinuria. This approach limits this invasive procedure to patients more likely to have a parenchymal abnormality that necessitates therapy.

Gross hematuria

Gross or macroscopic hematuria in children has an estimated incidence of 1.3 per 1000.[11] Gross hematuria of glomerular origin is often brown, cola-colored, or tea-colored, while that from the bladder or urethra is usually pink or red. A presentation of gross hematuria does require prompt initial evaluation to rule out potentially life-threatening etiologies. A urinalysis is again crucial, to confirm the presence of red blood cells as opposed to pigment changes caused by bilirubin (eg, in hemolysis) or myoglobin (eg, in rhabdomyolysis). RBC casts or dysmorphic RBCs are also more indicative of a glomerular or tubular origin, while eumorphic RBCs are more often seen when the source is urological. Whether the hematuria is painless (more likely with kidney origin) or painful (more common with infection, kidney stones, or urologic abnormalities) is another useful piece of information.

Potential etiologies of gross hematuria of kidney origin include the glomerulonephritides, the most common being acute post-infectious glomerulonephritis (PIGN). This diagnosis should be suspected with any history of antecedent sore throat or impetigo. The urinalysis often reveals proteinuria and the patient manifests varying degrees of edema, hypertension, and sometimes acute kidney failure with oliguria. The antistreptolysin O (ASO ) titer is often elevated with this diagnosis, but the most useful study is the serum C3 concentration, which is depressed in the acute phase, but should return to normal levels by 6 weeks after the initial presentation, if this is the correct diagnosis. Classic PIGN without hypertension, edema, azotemia, or oliguria can be successfully managed by a primary care pediatrician with frequent, often daily, follow-up, and with only phone consultation of a kidney diseases specialist as needed.

IgA nephropathy may present with recurrent gross hematuria, often preceded by or with a concurrent respiratory tract infection. TBMD, Alport's syndrome, and sickle cell trait may present rarely as episodic gross hematuria, but are more often seen with persistent microscopic hematuria. The renal involvement of Henoch-Schonlein purpura (HSP ) may also present with gross or microscopic hematuria with or without proteinuria, but has the characteristic systemic components to make the diagnosis more evident.

Other causes of gross hematuria can include renal tumors, most commonly Wilms' tumor in the pediatric population. Bladder tumors are rarer. Interstitial nephritis associated with analgesic or antibiotic use can also present rarely with visible urinary blood. Cystic renal disease can be discovered incidentally during the investigation of hematuria, or after mild trauma. Hemangiomas of the urinary tract can also cause gross bleeding.

Initial evaluation of gross hematuria, in addition to detailed history, family history, and physical examination (focusing on edema and hypertension) as above, should include urinalysis to confirm the presence and formation of RBCs, and quantification of proteinuria. Blood studies of RFP, CBC, C3, albumin, and ASO titer can also be of high yield, and must be checked when there is any suspicion that the hematuria could be of glomerular origin.

A urine culture should be performed to rule out bacterial infection, although viral infections may produce gross hematuria too and cannot be cultured. The demonstration of an apparent UTI should not be assumed to be the only etiology if incongruous findings also exist, such as significant proteinuria or hypertension.

Renal ultrasound is essential to uncover tumors (although rare), stones, cysts, or urological abnormalities. A history of trauma will likely necessitate a computed tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen and pelvis. If family history and lack of signs pointing to significant kidney disease (eg, no proteinuria or hypertension, normal kidney function) make stone disease or hypercalciuria more likely etiologies, a metabolic stone evaluation by a pediatric kidney diseases specialist is appropriate.

Proteinuria

While most proteinuria is usually discovered by urine dipstick on routine urinalyses, such dipstick methods are subject to false positive results when the urine is very concentrated or very alkaline. For this reason, the presence of abnormal protein excretion needs to be confirmed by other methods. The gold standard measurement of protein excretion remains the 24-hour urine collection (normal <4 mg/m2/hr or <100 mg/m2/day), although this may be misleadingly abnormal in a particular benign condition – orthostatic proteinuria (see below). As a complete 24-hour collection may also be difficult to reliably obtain in many pediatric patients, a "spot" urine protein to creatinine ratio (Uprot/UC r) is more typically used, and has been shown to correlate well with total protein excretion in both adults and children.12,13 A normal UProt/UCr for children over 2 years of age is <0.2 mgprotein/mgcreatinine(<0.5 in children 2–24 months of age). A 24-hour excretion of >40 mg/m2/hr or a "spot" ratio >2 is considered to be proteinuria in the nephrotic range, although hypoalbuminemia and hyperlipidemia (often accompanied by edema) are required to make the specific diagnosis of nephrotic syndrome.

The prevalence of proteinuria is difficult to define. A report describing the results of the Third National Health and Nutritional Examination Study of 4088 children found that 12% had abnormal albumin excretion on a cross-sectional sample of random urine specimens, with the highest rates being in adolescents.[14] This prevalence may adequately estimate the occurrence of positive results on random 1-time screenings, but it is likely that many of these subjects had transient or orthostatic proteinuria, both benign conditions.

Transient proteinuria may be present on 1 or 2 occasions. Persistent proteinuira is usually defined as 3 or more consecutive urine samples showing proteinuria.

Orthostatic proteinuria is most common in adolescents and young adults, and results in elevated urinary protein that resolves with recumbency. A random dipstick may read as high as 3-4+ in this condition, and a 24-hour protein excretion, while elevated, rarely exceeds 1g/m2/day. To make this diagnosis, a first morning Uprot/UCr should be obtained, advising the patient to void just before going to bed, and to remain recumbent until immediately before providing the sample. If this ratio is normal, and there are no other concerning findings on urinalysis or physical examination and history, no additional investigation is necessary. Yearly first morning urine samples should be sufficient for follow-up to assure normal functional outcomes.

If proteinuria is persistent and non-orthostatic, referral to a kidney diseases specialist is appropriate. Nephrotic-range proteinuria, especially with edema, should prompt immediate evaluation for nephrotic syndrome or chronic kidney disease.

Further investigation of persistent proteinuria will include RFP, complement levels, ANA, and hepatitis/HIV screening. Renal ultrasound may be useful, as unknown structural abnormalities may eventually result in glomerular damage and proteinuria. While the results of these studies may help narrow the differential, referral to a pediatric nephrologist is key, as a kidney biopsy is often required to determine precise diagnosis and appropriate therapy. Such diagnoses may include minimal change disease, focal segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS; primary or secondary to various infections, obstructive uropathy, or obesity), and membranous glomerulonephritis. When hematuria accompanies the proteinuria to a larger extent, especially with persistently depressed complement levels, membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis (MPGN) or lupus nephritis are more likely diagnoses.

Summary

The finding of isolated hematuria or proteinuria on random urine screening can be distressing to pediatric patients and their families. However, available information continues to support the fact that most patients have a benign condition,[15] and most children and adolescents found to have a single abnormality on a screening urinalysis do not have chronic kidney disease. While isolated findings of proteinuria or microscopic hematuria in an otherwise healthy and asymptomatic child may be confirmed or shown to be transient by a primary care physician prior to referral, persistence of findings should lead to consultation with a pediatric kidney diseases specialist, although this need varies by situation (Table 1).

The combination of both hematuria and proteinuria indicates a higher probability of significant renal abnormality, and deserves more extensive and earlier investigation, as does persistent non-orthostatic proteinuria. In particular, gross hematuria and any abnormalities accompanied by edema or hypertension require prompt evaluation.

References

[1.] Vehaskari VM, Rapola J, Koskimies O, et al. Microscopic hematuria in schoolchildren: Epidemiology and clinicopathologic evaluation. J Pediatr 1979;95(5):676-684.

[2.] Murakami M, Yamamoto H, Ueda Y, et al. Urinary screening of elementary and junior high school children over a 13 year period in Tokyo. Pediatr Nephrol 1991;5:50-53.

[3.] Dodge WF. Cost effectiveness of renal disease screening Am J Dis Child 1977;131:1274-1280.

[4.] Dodge WF, West EF, Smith EH, et al. Proteinuria and hematuria in schoolchildren: Epidemiology and early natural history. J Pediatr 1976;88:327-347.

[5.] Schwartz GJ, Haycock GB Edelmann CM Jr, Spitzer A. A simple estimate of glomerular filtration rate in children derived from body length and plasma creatinine. Pediatrics 1976;58:259-263.

[6.] Schwartz GJ, Feld LG, Langford DJ. A simple estimate of glomerular filtration rate in full-term infants during the first year of life. J Pediatr. 1984;104:849-854.

[7.] Schwartz GJ, Gauthier B. A simple estimate of glomerular filtration rate in adolescent boys. J Pediatr 1985;106:522-526.

[8.] Lee YM, Baek SY, Kim JH, et al. Analysis of renal biopsies in children with abnormal findings in urinary mass screening. Acta Paediatr 2006;95:849-853.

[9.] Meyers KE. Evaluation of hematuria in children. Urol Clin N Am

2004;31:559-573.

[10.] García-Nieto V, Ferrández C, Monge M, de Sequera M, Rodrigo MD. Bone mineral density in pediatric patients with idiopathic hypercalciuria. Pediatr Nephrol 1997;11(5):578-583.

[11.] Ingelfinger JR, Davis AE, Grupe WE. Frequency and etiology of gross hematuria in a general pediatric center. Pediatrics 1977;59:557-561.

[12.] Nagasako H, Kiyoshi Y, Ohkawa T, et al. Estimation of 24-h urine protein quantity by the morning urine protein/creatinine ratio. Clin Exp Nephrol 2007;11:142-146.

[13.] Price CP, Newall RG, Boyd JC. Use of protein:creatinine ratio measurements on random urine samples for prediction of significant proteinuria: A systematic review. Clin Chem 2005;51:1577-1586.

[14.] Mueller PW, Caudill SP. Urinary albumin excretion in children: Factors related to elevated excretion in the United States population. Ren Fail 1999;21:293-302.

[15.] Park YH, Choi JY, Chung HS, et al. Hematuria and proteinuria

in a mass school urine screening test. Pediatr Nephrol 2005;20:1126-1130.


You must log in or create a profile before you can take the quiz for this article.



 View all online offerings


Amy Bobrowski, MD
Attending physician, Kidney Diseases (Nephrology), Children's Memorial Hospital; Instructor in Pediatrics, Northwestern University's Feinberg School of Medicine
Read short biography